Genfare odyssey validating farebox programing instructions

Additional smartcard-enabled equipment, including vending devices, fareboxes, and readers will be deployed in support of the regional program. 6The most commonly used card (Cubic’s Go CARD) is not compliant. 3For this system, all these data types could be exchanged; however, to date they have not been used 4Members of the field operation test are provided incentives to participate in the form of discounts 5A smartcard transponder can be used to pay for parking or bus fare 6Automatic passenger counting 7Access to recreational facilities; access to gated communities 8Non-fare counting data (e.g., wheel lift and bike rack use) Key = Yes N/A = Not Available UC = Under Consideration POS devices and network, walk-in centers, and WMATA’s data network concentrator.An integral feature of the Smar Trip program will be the implementation of the Regional Customer Service Center (RCSC). ERG Group received the contract award in July 2003 to install and implement the RCSC.

• Section 3.2 identifies the commonalities in the information shared among agencies partici- pating in the listed interoperable programs.

• Section 3.3 discusses current trends and new developments being considered or pursued within the smartcard programs, including – Payment for parking, bridges, and highway tolls; – Applications for financial institutions and retail; and – Expanded security and biometrics features.

The RCSC will provide services to all Smar Trip participants and operators in the DC, Maryland, and Northern Virginia regions. CTS also received a contract in July 2003 to supply POS devices and the data network concentrator and to make upgrades to existing systems to support the regional program.

The RCSC will consist of the customer service center, Findings of Peer Review of Interoperable Smartcard Programs 29 30 Sm artcard Interoperability Issues for the Transit Industry Table 7. Physical-Layer Features W a s h i n g t o n , D C , S m a r T r i p S a n F r a n c i s c o , T r a n s L i n k 1 0 C h i c a g o , C h i c a g o C a r d S e a t t l e , R F C 1 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , G o - T o C a r d C e n t r a l F l o r i d a , O R A N G E S V e n t u r a C o u n t y , G o V e n t u r a L A C o u n t y , T A P 1 0 S a n D i e g o , C o m p a s s 1 0 L o n d o n , O y s t e r H o n g K o n g , O c t o p u s S i n g a p o r e , E Z - L i n k No11. CTS and ERG are working with WMATA to integrate their respective systems.

Moreover, the findings and current trends both within and outside the transit industry are compared.

Particularly, adding non-transit services (or becoming inter- operable with non-transit services) affects the data elements to be exchanged.

The research focused on identifying the information exchanged between participating agen- cies.

The survey data are intended to provide a benchmark for comparing the data elements crit- ical to achieving fare payment interoperability.

The optional data results of the survey are presented in Table 9.

Tags: , ,